difference between lcp and dcp plates

SMALL FRAGMENT SYSTEM - synthes.vo.llnwd.net

 · • Plate case stores a full range of 2.7 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.5 mm Broad DCP, LC-DCP or LCP plates • Includes auxiliary bins for storing additional equipment The standard system consists of: • Small Fragment Standard Instrument Set (103.501) • Small Fragment Standard Screw Set (103.518) • Small Fragment DCP Plate Set (103.513) and/or

A biomechanical comparison of conventional dynamic ...

 · In a 2014 study of Locking Compression Plates (LCP) versus Dynamic Compression Plates (DCP) in a canine ilial fracture model, there was no demonstrable difference between the constructs' performance in acute failure testing in vitro .

In-vitro comparison of LC-DCP- and LCP- constructs in …

 · (LC-DCP) and locking compression plate (LCP) constructs in an osteotomy gap model of femoral fracture in neonatal calves. Pairs of intact femurs from 10 calves that had died for reasons unrelated to the study were tested. A 7-hole LC-DCP with six 4.5 mm cortical screws was used in one femur and a 7-hole LCP with four 5.0 mm locking

Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The ...

 · Aims. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to assess the capacity of dynamic and locking compression plates (DCP and LCP) in improving fracture compression through the use of multiple compression screws, and the effect of alternating their placement between the two sides of the fracture compared with placing them all on one side.

Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The ...

There was no significant difference in compression between the first two compression screws in DCP and LCP (p = 0.64, 0.92). Conclusion Fracture compression can be improved either using multiple eccentrically placed screws alternated between the two sides of the plate in LCP and DCP, or by the use of a universal drill guide in DCP.

Dynamic Compression vs. Locking Plating − Is One "Better ...

 · Placing the LC‐DCP on the tension surface of the bone, where the metallic plate will be the strongest, gap motion and therefore fracture strain, will be limited as long as the LC‐DCP can maintain this function. 4.2 The LC‐DCP 4.2.1 Construct Basics. Plate‐bone‐screw constructs can function as either load‐sharing or load‐bearing ...

Fixation with a DCP or LC-DCP - AO Foundation

A 3- or 4 hole Dynamic Compression Plate (DCP) can be used successfully for this procedure. Another alternative represents the 3- and 4 hole Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plates (LC-DCPs). Plate preparation. The plate is contoured to approximate the dorsal surface of the distal proximal phalanx and proximal middle phalanx.

Effectiveness of Locking Versus Dynamic Compression …

The locking compression plate (LCP) with combination holes is a newer device in fracture fixation. We undertook a study comparing the LCP with limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) in ...

In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat ...

In medial-lateral and lateral-medial structural bending, significant differences were not found between the LCP and LC-DCP, however, at the gap, the LCP construct was stiffer than the LC-DCP in lateral-medial bending. Significant differences in behaviour over time were not noted between the plate designs during cyclical testing.

Basic Principles and Techniques of Internal Fixation of ...

 · • DCP, LC-DCP, 1/3 tubular, and reconstruction plates can all compress, but the effect is best with DCP and LC-DCP . Compression: Plate Design Eccentric drilling "away from" fracture . First, affix the plate, ideally with a screw . in neutral position, on the opposite side .

Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and ...

Introduction. Plates for internal fixation of fractures have been used for more than 100 years. Plating of fractures began in 1895 when Lane first introduced a metal plate for use in internal fixation.1 Lane's plate was eventually abandoned owing to problems with corrosion (Fig. (Fig.1). 1).Subsequently, Lambotte in 19092 (Fig. (Fig.2) 2) and then Sherman in 19123 introduced …

A comparison of conventional compression plates and ...

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the stiffness, yield load, ultimate load at failure, displacement at failure, and mode of failure in cantilever bending of locking compression plates (LCP) and dynamic compression plates (DCP) in an acute failure ilial fracture model. Our hypothesis was that the LCP would be superior to the DCP for all of these biomechanical …

- ...

A Primal Experimental Study of Designing and Manufacturing New Type of Point Contact-Locking Compression Plate (PC-LCP)

Biomechanical Comparison of ALPS, FIXIN, LCP And DCP ...

No significant differences were found between the ALPS and DCP groups. No significant differences were found for construct stiffness. In the DCP group, screw loosening was the predominant mode of failure, which was not found in the locking plate groups. Discussion/Conclusion: A significantly increased fatigue life was found for LCP and FIXIN ...

Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal ...

 · The mean interval to full weightbearing was 6.9 weeks for the STP group, 7.2 weeks for the LC-DCP group, and 7.6 weeks for the LCP-F group ().The interval to full weightbearing was not significantly different between the LCP-F and LC-DCP groups (p = .282) or LC-DCP and STP groups (p = .492).A significant difference was found between the LCP-F and STP groups …

Are locking plates better than non-locking plates for ...

 · Patients were subsequently divided into two groups according to the type of osteosynthesis used. The first group (n = 28) comprised patients in which a narrow, large-fragment dynamic compression plate (DCP, Synthes, Bettlach, Switzerland) was used ().In the second group (n = 40) a titanium locking compression distal tibial plate (LCP, Synthes, …

(PDF) The Comparison of LC-DCP versus LCP Fixation in …

The Comparison of LC-DCP versus LCP Fixation in the Plate Augmentation for the Nonunion of Femur Shaft Fractures after Intramedullary Nail Fixation January …

In-vitro comparison of LC-DCP- and LCP-constructs in the ...

 · To compare the biomechanical in-vitro characteristics of limited-contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) and locking compression plate (LCP) constructs in an osteotomy gap model of femoral fracture in neonatal calves. Pairs of intact femurs from 10 calves that had died for reasons unrelated to the study were tested. A 7-hole LC-DCP with six 4.5 mm cortical …

Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The ...

There was no significant difference in compression between the first two compression screws in DCP and LCP (p=0.64, 0.92). Conclusion: Fracture compression can be improved either using multiple eccentrically placed screws alternated between the two sides of the plate in LCP and DCP, or by the use of a universal drill guide in DCP. Although the ...

Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate …

 · The elastic limit strain of the plates was not different and was reached at a mean (95%CI) load of 241 N (190–292) for LCP versus 290 N (245–336) for LC-DCP-R (P = .12). Conclusion. The LC-DCP-R showed higher stiffness and resistance to failure, lower interfragmentary motion, and lower plate strain and stress compared to LCP.

Dynamic compression plates with limited bone contact

 · The LC-DCP plates are made of AO Pure Titanium, featuring optimum biocompatibility. Pure Titanium has mechanical properties different from stainless steel. Due to its lower modulus of elasticity, Titanium is more springy. Therefore Titanium plates should be somewhat over-bent to obtain the desired shape. The design of the LC-DCP plates ensures ...

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON FIXATION OF FRACTURE …

 · there was no significant difference in Romen's et al scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Though the average union time and recovery of ROM was found to be better for LCP as compared to DCP, it is not statistically significant. Complications such as infection were found to be higher with DCP as compared to LCP.

Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP) …

 · Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP ™) System The plates and screws are available in commercially pure (CP) titanium or 316L stainless steel. Grooved Undersurface •Provides limited contact between plate and bone, minimizing the chance for temporary osteoporosis under the plate. •Allows for periosteal callus formation at the

Are locking plates better than non-locking plates for ...

 · Functional evaluation at a mean of 45 months follow-up measured with the AOFAS score revealed no difference between the DCP and LCP groups (88 vs. 89). This could be explained in part by the generally good functional results …

Effectiveness of Locking Versus Dynamic Compression …

 · A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(2):121–125 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318160c84c. Crossref, Google Scholar; 26.

A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate ...

Objective: To determine if locking compression plates (LCP) are mechanically advantageous compared to low-contact dynamic compression plates (DCP) when used as a bridging plate in a synthetic model of osteoporotic bone. Methods: Five synthetic bars (Synbone Osteoporotic bone) were initially tested in compression and the Young's modulus determined.

Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression …

 · The results of these different fixation methods for forearm fractures in adults are similar and the correct selection and application of surgical technique is more important than the type of plate used. This study compares the results of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the dynamic compression plate (DCP) in the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults …

Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression …

Union was achieved in all patients. Mean time to union was 15 weeks (range, 12-25 weeks) in the LCP group and 17 weeks (range, 13-24 weeks) in the DCP group. In each group, 1 patient experienced delayed union, which required no additional surgical intervention. No significant difference was found regarding the time to union between the groups ...

Effectiveness of Locking Versus Dynamic Compression …

 · No significant difference was found regarding the time to union between the groups (P..05). No significant difference existed between the 2 groups in terms of Grace-Eversmann criteria and ... In all patients, 3.5-mm LCP or DCP plates were used. The authors attempted to provide fixation with a total of 3 screws (6